Tuesday 24 February 2009

Suicide

I've spent the last two days at a suicide intervention course ran by the Living Works organisation's ASIST (Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training) program. I went into the course with a really open and laid back attitude - I was at the course due to work -  and had not really thought too much about it beforehand. Although it was only two days, I found the experience extremely intense, mentally exhausting and ultimately extremely important.

As I mentioned, I had not really thought too much about suicide prior to going on the ASIST course. Sure, I was aware of it and had a few opinions/views on suicide but I had never sat down to really think about the subject at all. I'm also still unaware how much a lot of people think about suicide. I learned a lot over the last two days and part of me getting grips of it is writing it down - so why not on this blog thingmy.

On average, two people a day die in Scotland through suicide. In a country of five million odd people that didn't seem too much to me at first. Young men appear to be particularly at risk and although statistically females attempt suicide in greater numbers, males tend to actually 'successfully' kill themselves more - I use the word 'successfully' really loosely. Men also seem to pick more violent and extroverted means of suicide, whereas females tend to attempt more subtle methods. This is not to say that every man and women operate in this way, these are just the conclusions of statistical trends. As I was told this and when I found out a few more facts and figures my initial lack of  feelings began to change. In 2007 there were 838 people in Scotland who definitely or were suspected as dieing through suicide. That's more than two a day. It's also unclear as to if this figure is close to the truth - in reality the number is likely much higher. Not all suicides are defined as such on death certificates. On top of this, these figures don't say how many people consider suicide on daily basis. It has been estimated that 1 in 7 of us will never think about taking our own lives at some point in our lives - leaving the other six to at least consider suicide at one point. That is a huge number, a frightening number and it scared the shit out of me. However, the numbers that carry through on these thoughts is lower. On top of the people who are driven (and I accept there are a variety of reasons, including euthanasia in terminally ill people) there is a great affect on the people around the person who dies through suicide: family members, friends, acquaintances, work colleagues, support workers and countless other people.

Now, my thoughts on euthanasia in terminally ill people remain pretty unchanged. I fully understand people who have taken their own life in Swiss clinics or at home because of terminal illness or the prospect of facing a life of extreme physical pain.  I think that because I don't know how I will react if I ever face such a prospect. However, my focus here is on other people who seek suicide but still have reasons that they identify themselves for living. These situations where such people seek suicide are an altogether different kettle of fish. Anything can bring questions of suicide, from loosing a job, a partner, financial worry, physical or sexual abuse, to mental illness, substance abuse and an almost unlimited amount of other things. No one is immune. Distressing, difficult and awful events can lead to a person considering suicide - they cause so much pain. However, it can often be the case that a person who thinks about suicide often only wants to escape the pain. Escaping pain does not necessarily mean death, it's just that other options other than suicide can be very hard to see. It is in cases such as these that intervention models like the ASIST method, can be used to put someone in a much safer place within themselves.

Although I've just spent two days learning about suicide and suicide intervention, I still can't fully put my mind in the scenario of people that jump of bridges, overdose, slit their wrists or shoot themselves. This is not to say I can't understand the pain and the reasons - and I can see why no other options could present themselves. People must get so low, so down and find themselves in such dark places. Totally and utterly dark, where people cannot see any positive, no way to go on, feel desperate, suffocated and completely alone. The idealist in me thinks that if someone ever seeks you out when they feel like this, somewhere they have a reason to live. However, it really affects me when I think that some people get to these dark places and end up killing themselves. 

I really have to praise projects like ASIST. They need deserve mad props! Their drive to educate more people with a positive model for intervening means that more people can help each other when any of us (and it really can be any of us) finds ourselves in a really shitey, low, dark place.

Check out organisations like these and find out a bit more. Although I may sound like a right cheesey sod, they do such an important job.


Sunday 22 February 2009

Happy Birthday Robert Mugabe?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/feb/22/robert-mugabe-birthday-banquet

             www.zimbabwetimes.com (Image 1) www.ladestra.info (image 2)


Robert Mugabe is 85 years old. From what I've read he is throwing a bit of a party. In fact, it seems he has thrown quite the party every year for over 20 years. However, this year there has been a bit of a problem this year regarding a lack of 'donations'. Every year the celebrations for Mr Mugabe's birthday are organised by the 21 February movement -  a sort of Zanu PF take on the scouting movement (you can probably imagine what that entails). There was a problem this year and it looks like times are hard for Robert. The 21 February movement accordingly downgraded its aim and only set out to raise half a million dollars of 'donations'. Now, I'm sure you agree, that leaves a real headache for the organisers who were used to a figure closer to the 1.2 million dollars spent on last year's shindig. 'Donation' is a bit like the word 'democracy' or 'freedom' in the Zanu PF dictionary. Lots of food and money is given to the 21 February movement every year under what would best be described as dubious circumstances. Mr Mugabe is definitely feeling the pinch it seems...

However, Mr Mugabe isn't the only one who is finding it tough in Zimbabwe these days. The cholera epidemic in Zimbabwe has not been dealt with in an effective way. Although specific details are hard to come by (Zanu PF are much better at organising birthday parties for Mr Mugabe than they are at telling the truth it seems) , the UN puts the figure of dead at close to 4,000 with Oxfam estimating that around 50,000 are suffering. As people sat down for a birthday feast in honour of Mr Mugabe on Wednesday - paying 100 dollars each for the privilege - more than half of Zimbabwe's population of 12 million are starving. 

At least Robert Mugabe can take a bit of comfort in the knowledge that he is not the only one in Zimbabwe who's belt is tightening at the moment...


And for those who enjoy being lied to:

Friday 20 February 2009

Targets



I was on the Guardian website today and came across this:

Sometimes I think that governments can really shoot themselves in the foot when they set targets in certain areas. Tony Blair pledged to end child poverty by 2010, I've heard GB reiterate this ambition in the media on several occasions. Although it sounds great and I doubt you could find anyone who would be against ending child poverty - I think there is a problem with the setting of such targets.

Targets like this bring a timescale with them. The set time scale is probably the result of a number of factors and it could be argued that by setting a timescale it ensures that peoples' arses are in gear. However, as Polly Toynbee explains in the guardian article, Labour is likely to be a long way off in ending child poverty, in spite of the fact that they have done more than any previous government to end child poverty. So now, the Tories, who did considerably less for child poverty and actually intensified child poverty in the Thatcher years, have been handed a ready made dig at Labour. The scenario now is that Labour will have 'failed' in achieving this aim and the party that spent the 1980s creating the foundation of intensified child poverty will have gained a victory.

This is the problem with set targets. They are too one dimensional. There is always more to perceived 'failure' or 'success'

There is a similar problem with the Scottish Government's aim to end homelessness by 2012. Ive read a lot of the publications about this target (you can find them at  http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Built-Environment/Housing/access/homeless_). However, I live in one of the few areas where homelessness is on the rise in Scotland. I work for a homeless charity that suffers from lack of funding and lack of help from the local council. Overall, there is no chance that homelessness will end in Aberdeen by 2012. In fact, I'd bet you a pint that it rises. Despite the very ambitious and idealistic plans of both the Scottish Government and the local authority, I have yet to see one shred of evidence that the situation is improving. In fact it seems to be getting worse.

Targets look wonderful, sound great but unless they are followed up with hard graft across the board or they are set realistically, they ultimately prove more negative than positive. When targets prove negative - and they regard the most vulnerable people in society - it is even more frustrating.

WWF earth hour

http://www.wwf.org.uk/how_you_can_help/earthhour/signup/?setCookie&utm_source=FebNews&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=long

Sign up!

Thursday 19 February 2009

Banned...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/feb/19/britain-bans-us-cleric

I should bloody well hope people like this get banned!

Excellent

The things that bring you joy on a day off are amazing...

Wednesday 18 February 2009

Juggeling...

http://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/Article.aspx/1081377

This article discusses something that has been bothering me for a while... surely two full-time jobs are difficult at the best of times but combining the role of first minister and that of an MP? Surely even Alex himself wouldn't say he is capable of giving 100% in 2 roles - as there is no such thing as 200%...



... no wonder he looks so chuffed for himself