Simon Singh is being sued for libel by the British Chiropractic Association for daring the question the methodology and benefits associated with their practices in an article published in the Guardian in April 2008, and subsequently mass reposted yesterday in a mark of support (including here).
The use of libel laws to stifle such debate is clearly contrary to scientific progress. Progress which may well be to the benefit of the human race as a whole (perhaps a tad hyperbolic to associate abolishing libel laws in this context with advancing human progress, but I'm guessing you get the gist now).
It is imperative that the huge costs associated with defending such actions cannot be used to cow scientific journalists into submission by self-interested parties who may fear what scrutiny of their area may reveal.
If you agree with any of the above sentiments, I urge you to visit Sense about Science's campaign website, and support their campaign by signing their statement in support of amending libel laws in this context.
Those amongst you who support free speech; a free press; freedom of scientific endeavour; and the support of scientific progress may well wish to do so.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment